The Foot
Volume 17, Issue 1 , Pages 25-31, March 2007

The inferior calcaneal spur—Anatomical and histological considerations

  • Simon Smith

      Affiliations

    • Essendon Foot Clinic, 961 Mt. Alexander Road, Essendon, Victoria 3040, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61 3 9379 9224; fax: +61 3 9379 9498.
  • ,
  • Paul Tinley

      Affiliations

    • Department of Podiatry, School of Community Health, Charles Sturt University, New South Wales 2640, Australia
  • ,
  • Mark Gilheany

      Affiliations

    • East Melbourne Podiatry, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia
  • ,
  • Brian Grills

      Affiliations

    • School of Human Biosciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Victoria 3086, Australia
  • ,
  • Andrew Kingsford

      Affiliations

    • Kingsford Podiatry, Elsternwick, Victoria 3185, Australia

Abstract 

Background

The inferior calcaneal spur has long been associated with inferior heel pain. Traditionally, many physicians have believed the spur to be associated with the plantar aponeurosis, though more recently others report the spur to lie within the intrinsic musculature of the plantar rear foot. While previous anatomical studies have generally involved cadaveric specimens, there is a relative paucity of research which has specifically analysed the spur of surgical samples from symptomatic heels.

Objectives

This study was carried out to investigate the nature, affiliation and histopathology of the heel spur and the tissue in which the spur resides.

Methods

Heel spur samples were taken from five healthy participants undergoing open heel surgery for recalcitrant inferior heel pain involving the presence of a heel spur.

Results

The inferior calcaneal spur was found to lie consistently within the origin of the intrinsic musculature of the first layer of the plantar aspect of the foot. The plantar aponeurosis proper was observed to course inferior to the heel spur and had attachment to the spur along the spur's inferior margin. Microscopically, the entheses of the intrinsic musculature of the first layer and the plantar aponeurosis were amalgamated to form a single broad origin of the inferior medial calcaneal tubercle. The spurs lacked a cortical shell and endochondral ossification was a prominent feature. Overt fracture of the heel spur itself was a common finding.

Conclusions

Observations largely suggest a weight-bearing compressive disturbance, with secondary traction of the respective enthesis–bone unit as the underlying cause of spur growth. In this series, spurs were noted to manifest by means of endochondral ossification.

Keywords: Heel spur, Heel pain, Plantar fasciitis, Enthesopathy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0958-2592(06)00103-9

doi:10.1016/j.foot.2006.10.002

The Foot
Volume 17, Issue 1 , Pages 25-31, March 2007