The Foot
Volume 17, Issue 4 , Pages 205-213 , December 2007

Shod versus unshod: The emergence of forefoot pathology in modern humans?

  • B. Zipfel

      Affiliations

    • Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, South Africa. Tel.: +27 11 717 6683; fax: +27 11 717 6694.
  • ,
  • L.R. Berger

      Affiliations

    • Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
    • Institute for Human Evolution, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Received 20 February 2007 ,Revised 17 May 2007 ,Accepted 11 June 2007.

References 

  1. Trinkaus E. Anatomical evidence for the antiquity of human footwear use. J Archaeol Sci. 2005;32:1515–1526
  2. Wolff J. Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen. Berlin: Berlin Verlag; 1892;[Reprinted 1986: The law of bone remodeling]
  3. Sim-Fook L, Hodgson AR. A comparison of foot forms among the non-shoe and shoe-wearing Chinese populations. J Bone Joint Surg. 1958;40(5):1058–1062
  4. Ashizawa K, Kumakura C, Kusumoto A, Narasaki S. Relative foot size and shape to general body size in Javanese, Filipinas and Japanese with special reference to habitual footwear types. Ann Hum Biol. 1997;24(2):117–129
  5. Kusumoto A, Suzuki T, Kumakura C, Ashizawa K. A comparative study of foot morphology between Filipino and Japanese women, with reference to the significance of a deformity like hallux valgus as a normal variation. Ann Hum Biol. 1996;23(5):373–385
  6. Morioka M, Miura T, Kimura K. Morphological and functional changes of feet and toes of Japanese forestry workers. J Hum Ergol. 1974;3:87–94
  7. Thompson ALT, Zipfel B. The unshod child into womanhood-forefoot morphology in two populations. The Foot. 2005;15:22–28
  8. Barnicot NA, Hardy RH. The position of the hallux in West Africans. J Anat. 1955;89:160–161
  9. Engle ET, Morton DJ. Notes on foot disorders among natives of the Belgian Congo. J Bone Joint Surg. 1931;13:311–318
  10. Gottschalk FAB, Sallis JG, Beighton PH, Solomon L. A comparison of the prevalence of hallux valgus in three South African populations. S Afr Med J. 1980;57:355–357
  11. Saragas NP, Becker PJ. Comparative radiographic analysis of parameters in feet with and without hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int. 1995;16(3):139–143
  12. Barnett CH. The normal orientation of the human hallux and the effect of footwear. J Anat. 1962;96(4):489–494
  13. Shine IB. Incidence of hallux valgus in a partially shoe-wearing community. Br Med J. 1965;1:1648–1650
  14. Schulman SB. Survey in China and India of feet that have never worn shoes. J Nat Assoc Chiropodists. 1949;49:26–30
  15. Robbins SE, Hanna AM, Gouw GJ. Overload protection avoidance response to heavy plantar surface loading. Med Sci Sports Exer. 1988;20:85–92
  16. Robbins SE, Hanna AM. Running-related injury prevention through barefoot adaptations. Med Sci Sports Exer. 1987;19:148–156
  17. Kelikian H. Hallux valgus. Allied deformities of the forefoot and metatarsalgia. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1965;
  18. Inman VT, Mann R. Biomechanics of the foot and ankle. In:  Inman VT editors. Du’Vries surgery of the foot. 3rd ed.. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby Co.; 1973;
  19. Helal B, Wilson D. The foot. London: Churchill Livingston; 1988;
  20. Hetherington VJ. Hallux valgus and forefoot surgery. New York: Churchill Livingston Inc.; 1994;pp. 12
  21. McGlamry ED, Banks AS, Downey MS. Comprehensive textbook of foot surgery. Baltimore: Wiliams & Wilkins; 1992;
  22. DuVries HL. Acquired nontraumatic deformities of the foot. In:  Inman VT editors. Surgery of the foot.. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby Company; 1973;p. 204–229
  23. Burnfield JM, Few CD, Mohamed OS, Perry J. The influence of walking speed and footwear on plantar pressures in older adults. Clin Biomech. 2004;19:78–84
  24. Cavanaugh PR, Rodgers MM. Pressure distribution under the human foot. In:  Perren SM,  Schneider E editor. Biomechanics, current interdisciplinary research. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff; 1984;p. 85–95
  25. Holden TS, Muncey RW. Pressures on the human foot during walking. Aust J Sci. 1953;4:405–417
  26. Napier JR. The foot and the shoe. Physiotherapy. 1957;43:65–74
  27. Stott JRR, Hutton WC, Stokes IAF. Forces under the foot. J Bone Joint Surg. 1973;55B:335–344
  28. Kadambande S, Khurana A, Debnath U, Bansal M, Hariharan K. Comparative anthropometric analysis of shod and unshod feet. The Foot. 2006;15(4):188–191
  29. Hausman AJ. The biocultural evolution of Khoisan populations of Southern Africa. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1982;58(4):315–330
  30. Roberts N. The Holocene—an environmental history. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Inc.; 1989;pp. 121
  31. Sealy J, Pfeifer S. Diet, body size, and landscape use among Holocene people in the Southern Cape, South Africa. Curr Anthropol. 2000;41(4):642–655
  32. Stock J, Pfeiffer S. Linking structural variability in long bone diaphyses to habitual behaviors: foragers from the Southern African Later Stone Age and the Andaman Islands. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2001;115:337–348
  33. Roberts D, Berger LR. Last Interlacial (c. 117 kyr) human footprints from South Africa. S Afr J Sci. 1997;93:349–350
  34. Zipfel B. Morphological variation in the metatarsal bones of recent and pre-pastoral humans from South Africa. PhD Thesis. University of the Witwatersrand; 2004.
  35. Ortner DJ. Background data in paleopathology. In:  Ortner DJ editors. Identification of pathological conditions in human skeletal remains. San Diego: Academic Press; 2003;p. 37–44
  36. Ortner DJ. Methods used in the analysis of skeletal lesions. In:  Ortner DJ editors. Identification of pathological conditions in human skeletal remains. San Diego: Academic Press; 2003;p. 45–55
  37. Uitenbroek DG. Fisher exact [online]; 2000 [cited March 25, 2005]. Available from: URL: http://home.clara.net/sisa/fisher.htm.
  38. Franklyn R. The recognition, frequency and taxonomic association of skeletal pathology from the Plio-Pleistocene aged site of Coopers-B. South Africa. MSc Thesis. University of the Witwatersrand; 2005.
  39. Wilson DW. Hallux valgus and rigidus. In:  Helal B,  Wilson D editor. The foot. London: Churchill Livingston; 1988;p. 413–475
  40. Grode SE, McCarthy DJ. The anatomical implications of hallux abducto valgus—a criomicrotomy study. J Am Podiat Med Assoc. 1980;70(11):539–551
  41. Rzoonica E, Levitz S, Lue B. Hallux equinus. The stages of hallux limitus and hallux rigidus. J Am Podiat Med Assoc. 1984;74:390–393
  42. Vanore JA. Hallux limitus and rigidus. In:  Marcinko DE editors. Medical and surgical therapeutics of the foot and ankle. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1992;p. 423–465
  43. Klaue K, Hansen ST, Masquelet AC. Clinical, quantitative assessment of first tarsometatarsal mobility in the sagital plane and its relation to hallux valgus deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15(1):9–13
  44. Chang TJ. Stepwise approach to hallux limitus. Clin Podiat Med Surg. 1996;13(3):451
  45. Camasta CA. Hallux limitus and hallux rigidus. Clin Podiat Med Surg. 1996;13(3):423–448
  46. Roth RD. Rheumatology and associated connective tissue disorders. In:  Marcinko DE editors. Medical and surgical therapeutics of the foot and ankle. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1992;p. 700–705
  47. Susman RL, Brain TM. New first metatarsal (SKX 5017) from Swartkrans and the gait of Paranthropus robustus. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1988;79:451–454
  48. Susman RL, de Ruiter DJ. New hominin first metatarsal (SK 1813) from Swartkrans. J Hum Evol. 2004;47:171–181
  49. Zipfel B, Kidd R. Hominin first metatarsals (SKX 5017 and SK 1813) from Swartkrans: a morphometric analysis. HOMO-J Comp Hum Biol. 2006;57:117–131
  50. Saraiya MJ. First metatarsal fractures. Clin Podiat Med Surg. 1995;12(4):749–757
  51. Felder- Johnson KL, Murdoch DP, McGanty P. Lisfranc's fracture-dislocation. Clin Podiat Med Surg. 1995;12(4):565–602
  52. Vilaseca RR, Ribes ER. The growth of the first metatarsal bone. Foot Ankle. 1980;1(2):117–122
  53. Uberlaker DH. Skeletal evidence for kneeling in prehistoric Equador. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1979;51:679–686
  54. Boulle E. Evolution of two human skeletal markers of the squatting position: a diachronic study from antiquity to the modern age. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2001;115:50–58

PII: S0958-2592(07)00053-3

doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2007.06.002

The Foot
Volume 17, Issue 4 , Pages 205-213 , December 2007