Journal Home
Search for

Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 1-6 (March 2010)


View previous. 2 of 14 View next.

Preliminary investigation on the reduction of plantar loading pressure with different insole materials (SRP – Slow Recovery Poron®, P – Poron®, PPF – Poron®+Plastazote, firm and PPS – Poron®+Plastazote, soft)

Jasper W.K. TongaCorresponding Author Informationemail addressemail address, Eddie Y.K. Ngb

Received 29 January 2009; received in revised form 13 December 2009; accepted 16 December 2009.

Abstract 

Background

The aim of this study is to investigate the amount of pressure reduction for different padding and insole materials commonly used in the podiatry clinic.

Methods

Plantar pressure were taken for 5 subjects without insoles fitted (BF) in their daily sports shoes, and thereafter with 4 pairs of simple insoles (6.4mm thick) each as follow: SRP – Slow Recovery Poron®, P – Poron®, PPF – Poron®+Plastazote (firm) and PPS – Poron®+Plastazote (soft). In addition, subjects were also tested with semi-compressed felt (SCF) padding with a 1st metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) aperture cut-out bilaterally. Minimum, maximum, mean pressure and peak pressure at the hallux, 1st, 2nd, 3rd/4th and 5th MTPJ across both feet were analysed. Repeated measures ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni paired wise comparison was used to test for any statistical significance at the 95% confidence level for all pressure data.

Results

PPF was significant in reducing the minimum (p<0.005) and mean pressure (p<0.03) when compared to BF. This accounted for approximately 28% and 27% pressure reduction in minimum and mean pressure respectively. Peak pressure on the 1st MTPJ locality showed significant reduction of 37% and 29% with the use of SCF (p<0.004) and PPF (p<0.004), respectively.

Conclusions

All 4 commonly used insole materials were able to reduce pressure across the whole foot with PPF achieving significance. Off-loading the 1st MTPJ would still be best achieved with the commonly used plantar metatarsal pad of SCF with the aperture cut-out design.

a Podiatry Department, Blk 1 Level 1, Rehab Centre, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, Singapore

b School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798, Singapore

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +65 6326 6902; fax: +65 6326 5496.

PII: S0958-2592(09)00114-X

doi:10.1016/j.foot.2009.12.004


View previous. 2 of 14 View next.