Journal Home
Search for

Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 12-17 (March 2010)


View previous. 4 of 14 View next.

A comparison of electrosurgery and sharp debridement in the treatment of chronic neurovascular, neurofibrous and hard corns. A pragmatic randomised controlled trial

J.S. BevansCorresponding Author Informationemail addressemail address, G. Bosson

Received 22 September 2008; received in revised form 26 July 2009; accepted 11 March 2010.

Abstract 

A randomised controlled trial was undertaken to compare treatment outcomes for neurovascular, neurofibrous and hard corns. Patients with suitable lesions were referred from community clinics within Manchester PCT. Fifty-nine subjects were enrolled into the study and randomised to one of two treatment groups; group (a) those treated with electrosurgery and (b) a control group treated with standard sharp debridement. The principle outcome measure was the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score (0, no pain; 10, worst pain experienced) and lesions were categorised as demonstrating no change, partial or complete resolution. Data were analysed using ‘Intention to Treat’ methodology, i.e. analysis of data from subjects randomised to each group (electrosurgery group n=34; control group n=25). The results show a statistically significant reduction in pain in group (a) as reported at the 6 month review (p=0.0001) with a complete and partial resolution rate of 26% and 50%, respectively compared with group (b) whose pain level reduction was not significant and which showed resolution rates of 4% and 28% only.

Department of Podiatry, Manchester Community Health, NHS Manchester, Mauldeth House, Mauldeth Road West, Chorlton, Manchester M21 7RL, UK

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Podiatry, Newton Heath Health Centre, 2, Old Church Street, Newton Heath, Manchester M40 2JF, UK.

PII: S0958-2592(10)00004-0

doi:10.1016/j.foot.2010.03.003


View previous. 4 of 14 View next.